You took a loan from an NBFC — a non-banking financial company like a housing finance company, a microfinance institution, or a consumer finance company. The NBFC was not covered under the SARFAESI Act when your loan was given. Later, the NBFC sells your loan account to a bank. The bank then sends you a SARFAESI notice — a demand under Section 13(2) — threatening to seize your property. Can it do this? The Hon'ble Supreme Court has said yes, in a ruling that significantly expands the reach of SARFAESI.
What the Court Held
When a bank that is already covered under the SARFAESI Act acquires a non-performing secured loan account from an NBFC — even an NBFC that was not a notified financial institution under SARFAESI when the loan was originally advanced — the loan account immediately becomes covered by SARFAESI the moment it is assigned to the bank.
The principle: it is the nature of the acquiring institution, not the nature of the originating lender, that determines whether SARFAESI applies to a particular loan account at any given time.
Why This Matters
Many housing finance companies, micro-finance institutions, and consumer finance NBFCs routinely assign or sell their non-performing loan portfolios to banks. Borrowers who took loans from these NBFCs often believed they were protected from the drastic SARFAESI enforcement mechanisms — because the NBFC itself could not use SARFAESI. This ruling removes that assumption entirely.
The notice is legally valid even though your original loan was with an NBFC not covered under SARFAESI. The Supreme Court has confirmed that the bank can invoke SARFAESI after acquiring the loan. Your remedy for challenging the SARFAESI action remains a Section 17 application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) — but you cannot challenge the applicability of SARFAESI merely because the original lender was an NBFC.
Practical Guidance
If you received a Section 13(2) SARFAESI notice from a bank on a loan originally from an NBFC — do not ignore it. Respond within 60 days with your representation. If the bank proceeds with possession, file a Section 17 application before the DRT within the limitation period.
Grounds to challenge SARFAESI action remain available: notice not given properly, security interest not registered, loan amount disputed, property valuation incorrect, no NPA declaration served — these remain valid grounds even after this ruling.
For businesses and individuals with NBFC loans: if the NBFC has sold your loan to a bank, treat the bank with the same caution as if you had borrowed directly from it. SARFAESI enforcement is now available to the bank against your security.
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions people commonly search on this topic